About The planet

according to flatearth society, does planet like Jupiters, Mars, Saturnus, Venus etc exist?
are they also rotating the earth?

I'm sorry, I really don't understand your question (I'm guessing English isn't your first language?) but if you're asking if the planets exist, the answer is yes.

hallo please answer my question

hallo please answer my question

He did. There is no reason to bump a 20 day old post.

Many planets exist, although Neptune is a hoax planet created by the proto-conspiracy to corroborate the existence of gravity.

Many planets exist, although Neptune is a hoax planet created by the proto-conspiracy to corroborate the existence of gravity.

are those planet around the earth? same like the sun and moon
according to quran, there're seventh heaven....(multiple layers until 7 layers)

Many planets exist, although Neptune is a hoax planet created by the proto-conspiracy to corroborate the existence of gravity.

How is this behavior tolerated!?

Quote from: James on August 25, 2011, 07:10:45 PM

Many planets exist, although Neptune is a hoax planet created by the proto-conspiracy to corroborate the existence of gravity.

How is this behavior tolerated!?

We do not tolerate it at the Flat Earth Society; unfortunately, so-called scientists of globular fundamentalism tolerate all manner of wild claims and theorems and lies, such as the existence of this fantasy planet.

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 07:39:53 PM

Quote from: James on August 25, 2011, 07:10:45 PM

Many planets exist, although Neptune is a hoax planet created by the proto-conspiracy to corroborate the existence of gravity.

How is this behavior tolerated!?

We do not tolerate it at the Flat Earth Society; unfortunately, so-called scientists of globular fundamentalism tolerate all manner of wild claims and theorems and lies, such as the existence of this fantasy planet.

I have personally seen Neptune.

I have personally seen Neptune.

Was she nice with you?

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 07:47:50 PM

I have personally seen Neptune.

Was she nice with you?

Stop.

Stop.

If I tell you that I spent a night with Obama, would you trust me without evidence?

No.

I don't see why we should trust in your claims.

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 07:50:47 PM

Stop.

If I tell you that I have met Obama, would you trust me without evidence?

No.

I don't see why we should trust in your claims.

Then don't. I'm not the only one who has seen it.

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 07:50:47 PM

Stop.

If I tell you that I spent a night with Obama, would you trust me without evidence?

No.

I don't see why we should trust in your claims.

Then why should we trust any of yours?

Berny
Was Neptune.

Then don't. I'm not the only one who has seen it.

Many people see ghosts, and I do not think that Ghosts exist.

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 07:53:49 PM

Then don't. I'm not the only one who has seen it.

Many people see ghosts, and I do not think that Ghosts exist.

Ok. I'm going to assume that I am not hallucinating the particular dot in the sky that everyone calls Neptune. Do you think I am?

Ok. I'm going to assume that I am not hallucinating the particular dot in the sky that everyone calls Neptune. Do you think I am?

Stars got many names, and many people make confusions.

There is also a "virgo" constellation, that does not mean there is a virgin guy/girl in the outter space.

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 08:05:53 PM

Ok. I'm going to assume that I am not hallucinating the particular dot in the sky that everyone calls Neptune. Do you think I am?

Stars got many names, and many people make confusions.

There is also a "virgo" constellation, that does not mean there is a virgin guy/girl in the outter space.

Your argument makes no sense.

Quote from: Agnostic on August 25, 2011, 08:04:28 PM

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 07:53:49 PM

Then don't. I'm not the only one who has seen it.

Many people see ghosts, and I do not think that Ghosts exist.

Ok. I'm going to assume that I am not hallucinating the particular dot in the sky that everyone calls Neptune. Do you think I am?

Neptune doesn't appear from the Earth as a dot.  According to globularist dogma, it is not visible at all with the naked eye, and even with a telescope can only be seen as a faint haze.  I now see legitimate reason to doubt your claim.

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 08:05:53 PM

Quote from: Agnostic on August 25, 2011, 08:04:28 PM

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 07:53:49 PM

Then don't. I'm not the only one who has seen it.

Many people see ghosts, and I do not think that Ghosts exist.

Ok. I'm going to assume that I am not hallucinating the particular dot in the sky that everyone calls Neptune. Do you think I am?

Neptune doesn't appear from the Earth as a dot.  According to globularist dogma, it is not visible at all with the naked eye, and even with a telescope can only be seen as a faint haze.  I now see legitimate reason to doubt your claim.

Well obviously I didn't see it with the naked eye. Are you claiming a faint haze can not be called a dot under the loosest definition?

Your argument makes no sense.

Round Earth Theory makes no sense either.

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 08:08:18 PM

Your argument makes no sense.

Round Earth Theory makes no sense either.

Incorrect. It makes more sense than FET. The Earth being a sphere is not as absurd as everyone claims it is.

Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on August 25, 2011, 08:08:57 PM

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 08:05:53 PM

Quote from: Agnostic on August 25, 2011, 08:04:28 PM

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 07:53:49 PM

Then don't. I'm not the only one who has seen it.

Many people see ghosts, and I do not think that Ghosts exist.

Ok. I'm going to assume that I am not hallucinating the particular dot in the sky that everyone calls Neptune. Do you think I am?

Neptune doesn't appear from the Earth as a dot.  According to globularist dogma, it is not visible at all with the naked eye, and even with a telescope can only be seen as a faint haze.  I now see legitimate reason to doubt your claim.

Well obviously I didn't see it with the naked eye. Are you claiming a faint haze can not be called a dot under the loosest definition?

Maybe the loosest definition; but one way or the other, I wouldn't call seeing a faint blur of light proof that you've seen what we regard as a planet.

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 08:11:49 PM

Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on August 25, 2011, 08:08:57 PM

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 08:05:53 PM

Quote from: Agnostic on August 25, 2011, 08:04:28 PM

Quote from: Harutsedo on August 25, 2011, 07:53:49 PM

Then don't. I'm not the only one who has seen it.

Many people see ghosts, and I do not think that Ghosts exist.

Ok. I'm going to assume that I am not hallucinating the particular dot in the sky that everyone calls Neptune. Do you think I am?

Neptune doesn't appear from the Earth as a dot.  According to globularist dogma, it is not visible at all with the naked eye, and even with a telescope can only be seen as a faint haze.  I now see legitimate reason to doubt your claim.

Well obviously I didn't see it with the naked eye. Are you claiming a faint haze can not be called a dot under the loosest definition?

Maybe the loosest definition; but one way or the other, I wouldn't call seeing a faint blur of light proof that you've seen what we regard as a planet.

I didn't say it was a planet. James said Neptune didn't exist. I gave him evidence it does. Whether it is a planet or not is a different question.

I apologize; I figured that since the central question of this thread concerned the planets, not the planets and little blobs of blue light, that James was arguing that Neptune doesn't exist as a planet.  Neptune's historical origins suggest that he is indeed correct that if we assume the existence of a Conspiracy, the notion of Neptune as a planet may well be part of the hoax.

I apologize; I figured that since the central question of this thread concerned the planets, not the planets and little blobs of blue light, that James was arguing that Neptune doesn't exist as a planet.  Neptune's historical origins suggest that he is indeed correct that if we assume the existence of a Conspiracy, the notion of Neptune as a planet may well be part of the hoax.

I took his post to mean that he didn't think it existed, because he said it didn't exist, but if what you take it as is the consensus, fine.

Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on August 25, 2011, 08:54:41 PM

I apologize; I figured that since the central question of this thread concerned the planets, not the planets and little blobs of blue light, that James was arguing that Neptune doesn't exist as a planet.  Neptune's historical origins suggest that he is indeed correct that if we assume the existence of a Conspiracy, the notion of Neptune as a planet may well be part of the hoax.

I took his post to mean that he didn't think it existed, because he said it didn't exist, but if what you take it as is the consensus, fine.

I have no idea if it is or not; I have not seen the consensus on this issue.  For all I know James may very well have been saying that Neptune just doesn't exist.  I believe my take is a bit more logical than that, of course.  But the apology wasn't facetious.

here is a quote from the globularist RET :

"Neptune's atmosphere, while similar to Jupiter's and Saturn's in that it is composed primarily of hydrogen and helium"

If it were true, then the whole planet would immediately take fire... Nonsense.

here is a quote from the globularist RET :

"Neptune's atmosphere, while similar to Jupiter's and Saturn's in that it is composed primarily of hydrogen and helium"

If it were true, then the whole planet would immediately take fire... Nonsense.

That is not true. I have had helium balloons. They never caught fire.

That is not true. I have had helium balloons. They never caught fire.

Except if you bring a torch to it.

Things are worst with Neptune, as there is no "protective" matter around the so-called Neptune. Any incidental event could let it on fire immediately, it is obvious that due to all the events happening in the cosmos, such thing would already have happened with such an atmosphere.