I also think it arrogant to state we have dis-proven top scientists of the 1400's. Perhaps it is they who have found the truth. Until there is unbiased, independently verifiable evidence it is a theory.
This is either hilarious or incredibly sad: an evolutionary scientist who has published his works and has assistants does not know the Scientific Method that is taught to children like my 8 year old second grader.
For your information, the
truth and
proofs are the realm of philosophers and mathematicians, not scientists. The end product of modern science is the
theory and that is why Einstein's models are called
theories, not
laws. The phrase "it is just a theory" only comes from non-scientists that never cared to learn what "theory" means in science.
Every scientific theory is only right within a given range of conditions and a given margin of error. We can find that theories and hypothesis are wrong, but in most cases we just find overwhelming evidence that another theory is better. But we can find hypothesis that are simply wrong, like the one that attributed cholera and typhus to bad smells, and fifteenth century scientists had a lot of hypothesis that were completely wrong.
If you really are a scientist, do yourself a favor and learn the scientific method.
And if you really are an Evolutionary scientist, you must have a lot of bibliography that supports your views, not just Wikipedia. For a man that does not even quote the bibliography mentioned in Wikipedia (just the Wikipedia articles), you sure make a lot of claims about your scientific credentials.
You probably also believe in a "magical" force that causes us all to be pulled towards the core of the Earth. Now who is naive?
As if you hadn't shown your illiteracy in science already, you give us another example of your poor understanding of the subject. Whether "magical" or not, every force of nature is a force exerted from a distance, towards or away from the center of something. Science is not concerned with your interpretation of "magical", it is concerned with models and theories. Do you have a theory supported by a model and the corresponding evidence, about dinosaurs, gravitation or any other subject, or are you just mad at scientists in general?