I've believed in the earth being flat ever since I can remember. I was ridiculed in school for it, and later in life, co-workers and friends have tormented me over it. Now with the musical artist B.o.B announcing his support in our fight against tyrannical oppression and repression of the truth, how do you think the world will react? Will they still fight the facts staring in their faces? And why is it so hard for the majority of so called "intelligent life" to accept that we've been lied to? It's certainly not the first lie we were told, nor is it the biggest.
Please share your thoughts on how the general populace will handle this revelation.
And also, hi everyone. This is my first post (not sure if I got the right section), but it's great to see a community of free minds, and not just the normal mundane sheep.
I do hope that by "a community of free minds" you mean minds open to see both sides, not just what you believe.
Firstly, you need to ask just why you believe the earth to be flat.
For so many the basic reason seems to be "the earth looks flat, so it must be!" Then they have to find some way to explain the numerous things that do not fit that idea.
Then "gravity" seems a stumbling block for many. They can't understand how it can work, but do they really understand how the other "forces at a distance" work? While there are four fundamental forces of nature recognised, only two are familiar to most people:
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/cosmology/forces.html
- The electromagnetic force causes electric and magnetic effects such as the repulsion between like electrical charges or the interaction of bar magnets. It is long-ranged . . . . . . . . It can be attractive or repulsive, and acts only between pieces of matter carrying electrical charge.
- The gravitational force is weak, but very long ranged. Furthermore, it is always attractive, and acts between any two pieces of matter in the Universe since mass is its source.
The reasons that gravity seems so "magic" seem to be:
- Since it so weak we cannot easily see its effects or demonstrate it as we can magnetic or electrostatic forces.
- Since if depends on mass a speck of dust or a water droplet (mist) can float on the tiniest upcurrent of air, yet it can hold the oceans and atmosphere against forces that "fling" then away.
Then you should look at just why the globe (sometime a few centuries BC) and finally rotating globe (around 1,600 AD) came to be generally accepted. These were not just some rash ideas that popped into someone's head, but a gradual development based of earth bound and astronomical observations over many hundreds of years.
The globe and finally the heliocentric globe became accepted because they best fitted the apparent motions of the sun, moon, planets and stars.
I will leave it there, but could go into much more detail of how the ideas were developed and how the early "Church" and to a lesser extent (because I don't know so much on it) early Islamic astronomers view these matters. On the latter point the work of many Islamic leaders during the western "Dark Ages" is often ignored, but some of the earliest quite accurate estimates of the earth's diameter come from the Middle East. Have a look at the work of "Al-Biruni" (Sep 973 – Dec 1048). He is regarded as "is regarded as the
father of geodesy for his important contributions to that field". From
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Biruni.
In the "Church", both Roman Catholic and Protestant, the globe earth has long been accepted, but until sometime in the period 1,650 - 1,800 AD the stationary earth still had a lot of support.
(Sorry, my "leave it there" did not quite work.)