Other Discussion Boards > Philosophy, Religion & Society

murder

(1/5) > >>

optimisticcynic:
would it be worse to kill someone or go back in time and make it so they never existed. at least if you kill someone they had a chance to live. then if you believe in the soul, the thing that goes on after you die you stopped it from being created. That would be the closest to destroying someones sou as you could come. so which is worse?

d00gz:
I don't care.

Since it's not really possible, i shall waste no time thinking about it.

Nomad:
Obviously you never watched Timecop.

Ocius:
I'll moida da bum.

semperround:

--- Quote from: optimisticcynic on September 16, 2009, 07:43:12 AM ---would it be worse to kill someone or go back in time and make it so they never existed. at least if you kill someone they had a chance to live. then if you believe in the soul, the thing that goes on after you die you stopped it from being created. That would be the closest to destroying someones sou as you could come. so which is worse?

--- End quote ---
you would quite possibly create an alternate reality in which said person never did exist. it couldn't be murder if he never existed. and, of course, the reality you left would continue with aid person living out the rest of their life.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page