« on: May 23, 2013, 05:31:58 PM »
As a legitimate flat Earther, I'm partial to a modified neo-Tychonian system
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
But wait, it gets better!
Some highlights:QuoteBe careful with single mothers, married women, and divorced women.QuoteMales who spend their lives trying to please women are manginas.
Manginas love to club, drive cool cars, dress up, and act tough.
The biggest, baddest males are often the weakest willed manginas.
Males raised by single mothers or weak fathers end up manginas.
Marriage is for manginas who cannot say "no" to their girlfriends.
Manginas let girlfriends, parents, and society dictate their future.
Real men do not let anyone pressure them into marriage (slavery).
Conscious awareness can reverse a lifetime of brainwashing.
When your buddies act like manginas, tell them: "Check your balls."QuoteMen enjoy hobbies, sports, eating, and conversing with other men.
Bachelorhood is exciting, enjoyable, relaxing, peaceful, and easy.
Retire at 50, date slender foreign women half your age, live it up.
And here are their forums!
So people can "pounce" on me by questioning my distaste for white girls wearing warbonnets, but when Eddy is uncomfortable about a passive aggressive girl, a woman who's nervous about men on a train, and then makes a weird rape comment and we question him suddenly we're over-reacting, pouncing on him, berating him, etc?
I call bullshit.
His comments were strange to me and I was only trying to discuss the issue further. This whole thread is becoming stupid now since Eddy is no longer taking part and others feel like they have to be white knights for him.
You're missing the point. You said "probably" as in there is a possibility you could get it up for rape. Before you said rape makes your blood boil more than any other crime, if that were the case you would be so repulsed by the idea of rape that there would be no room for the possibility of an erect penis. But in this case, you implied that you had considered a pleasant outcome to rape.
And you can rape someone with any phallic object, you dope.
I thought that people, rooster in particular, were over-reacting to Eddy's rape comment and were doing so in a rather hypocritical manner, and said that I thought so. This doesn't seem unreasonable to me, because it's accurate.
What you said specifically was:Quoteshe started flipping out over a comment which was in no way offensive (Eddy's rape comment. Really, rooster's interpretation was the exact opposite of what he was saying. He was commenting that for guys such as himself and me who aren't particularly violent, rape is the least sexy thing ever).
Nobody was flipping out at the comment, they were questioning it. And the questioning wasn't unwarranted. Here's the exact quote:All I want is for us all to be treated equally, with no assumed guilt. But as a man I don't get that from these crazy people.
Even though I'm quite wimpy and really don't like conflict. Probably couldn't even get it up for a rape.
Does that really not sound incredibly sketchy to you? In the first place, the word "probably" doesn't exactly conjure up images of superlatives like "least," but even more than that, it's like he was implying that his problem with rape is sexual in nature, rather than, you know, moral. He might as well have said, "Rape isn't much of a turn-on for me," or "Having a woman struggle against you really kills the mood."
Uncertainty Principle, you can't see how fast something is and where it is at the same time with the same level of accuracy. What do you not understand about that?
I didn't ask what it was, I asked why physicists are so bad at explaining it to laymen. You're not even a physicist. I know perfectly well what it is. You think you're so smart, Rushy, let's see you explain it rather than just state it, shall we?
The reason you cannot measure both the position and speed is beacuse to measure something you have to interact with it. there are two ways to do this, to get the speed you use the wave function, and to get the position you use the partile function; when a particle hits another particle it interrupts its speed, and when you use a wave it is spread out so the position is only probable.
|What is the Uncertainty Principle?|
Please explain it.So I'm a physicist. I am finishing off a Masters in general physics and am currently applying to PHDs. Hence I know lots of science. If any of you have questions (which is why most people come to this forum) I will try to answer them and explain them. I should clarify, I am a round earth believer so I believe main stream physics. If any parts of main stream science confuse you / to you there seem to be holes in theory I will try to explain the confusing jargon / explain what modern science's answer to that hole in theory is.
When I look in the mirror, I am back to front but not upside down. Why?
It's actually not very complicated, if you think about it.
And now it's a woman's fault for making a misogynistic man? Great.
Yeah, rooster. It is always a woman's fault when men do awful things, didn't you know?
Tausami, who pulled the Nazi card? Oh, you did. Also, no one has "flipped out" over Eddy's rape comment. Not rooster, and not me. Discussing it doesn't equal flipping out. Do you even realize that you're being condescending and sexist by labeling the response as "flipping out"? Probably not.
Apparently you think it's worse for a woman alone on public transport to be cautious than to be attacked. Sexism against men causes men to become sexist and violent? Next you'll be saying that the way a woman dresses causes rape. Everyone makes snap judgements about the people they see around them. People make decisions to protect their personal safety all the time. If you're on a bus and some thuggish looking guy decides to sit right next to you, would you feel uncomfortable? Does that make you sexist? If he's black, does that make you racist? What if it's a dirty old homeless woman? Uncomfortable and disgusted, right? Does that make you a heartless bastard? Nope, it's normal.
I don't take offense at what you posted. I hope you'll try to see things from different perspective.
it's a woman's fault for making a misogynistic manWhat I said is that our stereotype of the misogynistic man is rather self-sustaining. I did not single out women as being the perpetuator of this stereotype, nor did I place sole blame on the stereotype, nor did I make any mention of where the stereotype came from. I was simply sharing something I read on the blog of some professor of woman's studies or something like that and have been thinking about quite a bit lately.
If it was this simple, why did it take you guys almost two millenia to figure out?
The stranglehold of the church hindered scientific progress for a majority of that time.
FEers face a similar stranglehold.
Has this forum been shut down? You're free to think as you please, conduct experiments as you please, and collaborate as you please. There is no stranglehold for FEers other than the theory they believe in.
actually im just posting a video. Not trying to start a debate with you clowns. I think it's best that I just accept that you're all idiots. Anyway, I can't wait for this film.
Assuming a frictionless environment (in which case coriolis wouldn't matter, because while the rocks would be forced up against the sides of the tunnel this would not slow them down) and assuming that the rocks are a nice, spherical shape and of equal mass, it would be the best Newton's Cradle ever.
Otherwise, they would never reach the center due to coriolis.
How would it be a Newton's cradle?
Also, Coriolis is null if they are dropped from the north and south pole. In that case, they would fall into each other and ricochet some way into the side of the tunnel, then sort of float around the center until they came to rest against each other after a VERY long time.
So I'm a physicist. I am finishing off a Masters in general physics and am currently applying to PHDs. Hence I know lots of science. If any of you have questions (which is why most people come to this forum) I will try to answer them and explain them. I should clarify, I am a round earth believer so I believe main stream physics. If any parts of main stream science confuse you / to you there seem to be holes in theory I will try to explain the confusing jargon / explain what modern science's answer to that hole in theory is.
When I look in the mirror, I am back to front but not upside down. Why?