cartesian...you have a crude and brutish approach to science.
There is no updraft that could explain how a cumulonimbus cloud, weighing at some 1 BILLION TONS, floats effortlessly in front of our eyes.
To claim that an updraft appears suddenly and carries each cloud along on its trajectory, no matter what weight, its direction, is ludicrous, to say the least.
You wrote, confirming your brutish approach to scientific thought:
EDIT: Oh, one small question before I go, do you know why the rain falls to the ground? There is a force which attracts those drops of water to the ground and it's called ..... GRAVITYThere is no such thing as attractive gravity: see the Bruce DePalma spinning ball experiment, the Barometer Pressure Paradox, and much more.
Drops of water (rain) fall to the ground because of the influence of PRESSURE GRAVITY (dextrorotatory telluric waves, proven to exist by the experiments carried out by Dr. Dayton Miller) on those very drops.
This could only happen on a flat surface of the Earth.
The Tunguska event proves clearly that the surface of the Earth is flat.
Let go back to the points I made, which you ignore completely each and every time.
Clouds ARE NOT water vapour: they are either water droplets or ice crystals.
Official science explanation: Clouds stay aloft for the same reason that dust motes floating around, also heavier than air: air drafts push them around.
But, just like the pseudo-explanation you came up with, this cannot be true.
But that doesn't explain why water molecules condensed into liquid form 1000 times denser than the air directly below them, manage to suspend themselves against gravity.
Please read carefully.
The cloud argument based on wind holding them up does not work in this case. And neither does the moist air less dense than dry air argument (although that doesn't work for clouds either because we are talking about condensed water in liquid form not the gaseous vapour form).
Fog can appear on frozen lakes so I doubt covection is operating in that case. We are talking about droplets that are 1000 times the density and weight of the very slow moving warm air below moving upward. There shouldn't be any physical process to overide the gravity pulling on those droplets.
I think it's obvious there is another unexplained process of an electrical nature suspending the water against the pull of gravity.
More details.
I find it hard to accept that 1000 times denser and heavier water droplets are able to be suspended by air molecules. They may counteract the pull of gravity for a short while for but the weight should overwhelm this buffeting pretty quick. For it to last even a short while the air molecules would need to be flowing mainly upwards but this certainly isn't true within a milimeter of the surface of the earth. There is a reason the gravity is counteracted and its not convection or updraft. I only state that I believe the reason to have an electrical nature.
I am certain that electricity plays a far larger role generally in the atmosphere than the mainstream is aware of or is willing to admit.
Floating clouds that defy gravity are a direct observational contradiction to the pseudoscientific cult of gravitation.
antonio, you tried this kind of approach before...at the Moon Radio thread...it did not work then, it won't work now.
There is always a very good reason I mention something in my messages: the cyclones/anticyclones information is meant to increase your knowledge about atmospheric physics.
In the context of the round earth theory, YOUR VIDEO IS COMPLETELY UNEXPLAINABLE.
A lenticular cloud is formed by the action of the telluric currents (the vortices created by them).
Let me show just how little you know about this subject.
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2007/arch07/071217electricclouds.htmCloud formations often exhibit structure that could be the result of something other than blowing winds. Does ionized plasma actually shape the clouds?
In a recent press release, scientists from the Weizmann Institute and the Goddard Space Flight Center announced that a mysterious zone of previously undiscovered particles fills the airspace around clouds.
The very formation of a cloud, its effortless floating although its weight runs in the millions of tons, is explained by the fact that terrestrial gravity = electricity = magnetism, just as proved by the Biefeld-Brown effect.
Anvil clouds are even more mysterious.
Official science: Anvil clouds form in the tops of thunderstorms 5 to 10 miles high and consist mainly of ice.
Therefore, your own very video proves that cloud formation/trajectories are explainable only by taking into account the vortex theory of terrestrial gravity.
There is no diversion, as before considering some extraordinary explanations, you should perhaps start with the basics You skipped this first step, and you are still avoiding my simple request. How many times do we really have to go through this? I have studied very carefully cloud droplet microphysics. There is nothing there that explains how a cumulonimbus cloud weighing some 1 billion tons can float IN SPITE of attractive gravity.
rottingroundearththeory, you are the same person who wrote this:
At night time the air is going to cool which will increase your barometric pressure. As heating occurs, pressure will lower to give you this "10am" maximum and then your minimum at "4pm". At this time the offset occurs in which pressure starts to increase again giving you that minimum. It is merely heat transfer affecting the gas particles as each transition occurs and it is that transition that gives you the semidiurnal max and min. YOU HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE VERY BASIC FACTS OF PHYSICS.
In the world in which you live, A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IS ACHIEVED BY A LOWERING THE SAME PRESSURE.
Brilliant.
You wrote further:
Clouds and mist are aerosols. Again, no knowledge of atmospheric physics.
Aerosols INTERACT WITH CLOUDS, they are not clouds.
I ask you again, DO YOU UNDERSTAND ENGLISH?
From the National Weather Service website:
The most basic change in pressure is the twice daily rise and fall in due to the heating from the sun.
Each day, around 4 a.m./p.m. the pressure is at its lowest and near its peak around 10 a.m./p.m. The magnitude of the daily cycle is greatest near the equator decreasing toward the poles.
http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/yos/resource/JetStream/atmos/pressure.htmYOU STILL DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SEA LEVEL PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AND TRUE BAROMETER/ABSOLUTE MEASUREMENTS, DO YOU?
At observation stations around the world, through a series of calculations, the air pressure reading, regardless of the station elevation, is converted a value that would be observed
if that instrument were located at sea level.Can't you even understand something as basic as this?
The sea level pressure measurements cannot be used to study the semidiurnal patterns of the pressure of the barometer, as they are used for a very quick estimation of the pressure.
To scientifically study true/absolute barometer pressure, you calculations must be much more involved.
Have you really lost your mind?
You NEVER showed anything other than sea level pressure measurements, nothing else: you have never shown that the semidiurnal barometer changes do not actuall occur somewhere.
Let us go through the same routine again, this time maybe you will understand.
http://books.google.ro/books?id=vNkZAQAAIAAJ&pg=RA1-PA217&lpg=RA1-PA217&dq=barometer+pressure+semidiurnal+change+10+am+4+pm&source=bl&ots=zgQHfJMC_w&sig=NMbmgLuqwPVwEfGVp3WuSu8Mdgg&hl=ro&sa=X&ei=-As4UqWRL4qp4ATI2ICIBA&ved=0CEAQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=barometer%20pressure%20semidiurnal%20change%2010%20am%204%20pm&f=falseTHIS IS REAL SCIENCE: DAILY SEMIDIURNAL CHANGES IN THE BAROMETER PRESSURE READING.
Maximums at 10:00 am and 10:00 pm, and minimums at 4:00 am and 4:00 pm.
HERE IS THE REAL DATA ON TAIWAN:
http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~geerts/cwx/notes/chap01/diurnal.htmlSurface pressure measurements in Taiwan (at 25 deg. N) are least around 4am and (especially) 4 pm Local Standard Time, and most around (especially) 10am, and 10pm LST; the amplitude of the semidiurnal cycle is about 1.4 hPa.
My links provide the correct information about the maximums and minimums of the barometric pressure readings, as always.
Lord Rayleigh says: ‘The relative magnitude of the latter [semidiurnal variations], as observed at most parts of the earth’s surface, is still a mystery, all the attempted explanations being illusory.’
Most parts, that is, WHERE THE PHENOMENON WAS ACTUALLY STUDIED. In other parts, the measurements were simply not performed, that is what Lord Rayleigh meant.
You can find more of what actually Lord Rayleigh meant in his paper:
1890, On the vibrations of an atmosphere, Phil. Mag. (5), 29, pg. 173-180.
Now, the precise demonstration that the barometer pressure paradox DEFIES ATTRACTIVE GRAVITY.
One maximum is at 10 a.m., the other at 10 p.m.; the two minima are at 4 a.m. and 4 p.m.
The heating effect of the sun can explain neither the time when the maxima appear nor the time of the minima of these semidiurnal variations. If the pressure becomes lower without the air becoming lighter through a lateral expansion due to heat, this must mean that the same mass of air gravitates with changing force at different hours.THIS HAPPENS EVERYWHERE, EACH AND EVERY DAY, as documented in the links I provided here so clearly.
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE official information
The most basic change in pressure is the twice daily rise and fall in due to the heating from the sun. Each day, around 4 a.m./p.m. the pressure is at its lowest and near its peak around 10 a.m./p.m. The magnitude of the daily cycle is greatest near the equator decreasing toward the poles.
http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/yos/resource/JetStream/atmos/pressure.htmFor example, here is the data in Taiwan:
http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~geerts/cwx/notes/chap01/diurnal.htmlSurface pressure measurements in Taiwan (at 25 deg. N) are least around 4am and (especially) 4 pm Local Standard Time, and most around (especially) 10am, and 10pm LST; the amplitude of the semidiurnal cycle is about 1.4 hPa.
It has been known now for two and a half centuries, that there are more or less daily variations in the height of the barometer, culminating in two maxima and two minima during the course of 24 hours.
The same observation has been made and puzzled over at every station at which pressure records were kept and studied, but without success in finding for it the complete physical explanation.AGAIN, PLEASE UNDERSTAND.
One maximum is at 10 a.m., the other at 10 p.m.; the two minima are at 4 a.m. and 4 p.m.
The heating effect of the sun can explain neither the time when the maxima appear nor the time of the minima of these semidiurnal variations. If the pressure becomes lower without the air becoming lighter through a lateral expansion due to heat, this must mean that the same mass of air gravitates with changing force at different hours.